The Love Bucket Trademark, Pinterest, and Endearment
Thursday, February 16th, 2012 Posted in Heart, Her Love Bucket, The Love Bucket®, The Love Linguist® | No Comments »The Love Bucket® Trademark, Pinterest, and Endearment
The Love Bucket® is on Pinterest. This is the official pinboard with more pins to be added.
Other people have used the term but it does not relate to The Love Bucket Concept (that relates to the trademark. ) Here are a couple more beneath the Official pinboard, The Love Bucket®, on Pinterest. Often you hear the words ‘love bucket’ as a term of endearment. That is not The Love Bucket Trademark for the USPTO, United States Patent and Trademark Office.
You are my love bucket. When someone uses the term ‘love bucket’ as a term of endearment it is the same as saying something like there are ‘four seasons’ of love. This could not be confused with Vivaldi’s musical composition, Four Seasons. Or the Four Seasons of spring, summer, winter, and fall.
The Love Bucket® is a term used in commerce.
Another related trademark term used in commerce is Love Bucket Book. Although not registered, it has been in use since 2008. Have you read a Love Bucket Book?
Please respect The Love Bucket Trademark and no matter if you are a “famous” company, using a trademarked concept that has been circulating for several years that becomes part of the conversation because it simplifies and makes so much sense, should not be used in promotions for public relations or financial gain. Thank you!
Read love bucket article on The Love Bucket concept here:
The Love Bucket Concept #lovebucket
Sherrie Rose
The Love Linguist
Dedicated to Enhancing Your Love and S*X Life!
==================================
Follow @SherrieRose on Twitter and you’ll get a Direct Message with bonus link for a free Love Bucket Book™
The Love Bucket is a registered trademark. Love Bucket Books™ can be found at http://lovebucketbook.com
==================================
Love Bucket Book & Love Bucket Books
Friday, September 2nd, 2011 Posted in Love Bucket Book, Love Bucket Books | No Comments »
 |
 |
 |
Thanks to one of our loyal customers it was brought to our attention that Love Bucket Books website is not functioning… however, Love Bucket Books website is NOT the website; book is singular => LoveBucketBook.com
Get a free Love Bucket Book for free simply be following @SherrieRose on Twitter and you’ll get a direct message with a link to your very own Love Bucket Book.
Enjoy a Love Bucket Book Today!
Sherrie Rose
The Love Linguist
Dedicated to Enhancing Your Love and S*X Life!
=================================
Follow @SherrieRose on Twitter and you’ll get a Direct Message with bonus link for a free Love Bucket Book™
The Love Bucket is a registered trademark. Love Bucket Books™ can be found at http://lovebucketbook.com
==================================
Love Bucket Blog is a Networked Blog
Sunday, July 3rd, 2011 Posted in Love Bucket Books, The Love Bucket® | No Comments »
14 Tenses of Love – How to Identify If Your Love Is Intense Enough to Fill the Love Bucket!
Monday, March 7th, 2011 Posted in The Love Bucket® | No Comments »
The 14 Tenses of Love
|
Past |
Present |
Future |
NOTES |
|
LOVED |
LOVE |
WILL LOVE |
|
|
I loved her. |
I love her. |
I will love her. |
|
|
I loved to fill her love bucket. |
I love to fill her love bucket. |
I will love to fill her love bucket. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Past Emphatic |
Present Emphatic |
||
|
DID LOVE |
DOES LOVE / DO LOVE |
||
|
I did love her. |
I do love her. |
||
|
I did love to fill her love bucket. |
I do love to fill her love bucket. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past Perfect |
Present Perfect |
Future Perfect |
|
|
HAD LOVED |
HAVE LOVED |
WILL HAVE LOVED |
|
|
I had loved her. |
I have loved her. |
I will have loved her. |
|
|
I had loved to fill her love bucket. |
I have loved to fill her love bucket. |
I will have loved to fill her love bucket. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past Perfect Progressive |
Present Perfect Progressive |
Future Perfect Progressive |
|
|
HAD BEEN LOVING |
HAVE BEEN LOVING |
WILL HAVE BEEN LOVING |
|
|
I had been in love with her. |
I have been in love with her. |
I will have been in love with her. |
|
|
I had been filling her love bucket. |
I have been filling her love bucket. |
I will have been filling her love bucket. |
"will" |
|
|
|
I am going to be filling her love bucket. |
"be going to" |
|
Past Progressive |
Present Progressive |
Future Progressive |
Progressive is also known as continuous |
|
WAS LOVING |
AM LOVING |
WILL BE LOVING |
|
|
I was in love with her. |
I am in love with her. |
I will be in love with her. |
|
|
I was filling her love bucket. |
I am filling her love bucket. |
I will be filling her love bucket. |
Sherrie Rose
The Love Linguist
Dedicated to Enhancing Your Love and S*X Life!
==================================
Follow @SherrieRose on Twitter and you’ll get a Direct Message with bonus link for a free Love Bucket Book™
The Love Bucket is a registered trademark. Love Bucket Books™ can be found at http://lovebucketbook.com
==================================
What’s Hiding in Your Love Bucket? (oh… the MYSTERY of it all!)
Thursday, February 17th, 2011 Posted in The Love Bucket® | No Comments »
Everyone wants to know the secret of the love bucket. What’s inside? What is the story that is contained in the Love Bucket Book?
It is the mystery and intrigue that captures our human curiosity. It is much easier to keep the suspense going when you barely know someone, like on a first date. It takes more ingenuity, creativity, planning and effort when you are in an established relationship. But, filling the love bucket is something that works both in dating and relating. You can discover more about dating and relating in the 5 Love Dynamics program: http://5LoveDynamics.com
For the guys, they immediately think that the 7 Ways to Fill the Love bucket are sexual techniques and positions. That you can find out about in http://FemaleOrgasmExplained.com where the intimacy experts explain Female Orgasm. That is a mystery you want revealed!
Now, since we are still in Valentine’s week or month to some people, dating and romance are top of mind. Here’s a full story posted on the Huffington Post about mystery in dating:
You’ve just been on a first date with a woman you find attractive and intelligent, and things went well — at least from your point of view. The conversation was comfortable, and you have the same taste in books and politics. You’re still savoring the pleasure of the experience when you run into a mutual friend, who reports some good news: Your date really had a good time, too, and is looking forward to seeing you again soon.
But what if, instead, your mutual friend hems and haws and finally shares that the woman liked you “well enough,” which anyone can translate as “bored to tears”? Or what if (yet another scenario) your mutual friend leaves you dangling? Your friend has indeed talked to the woman since your date but is uncertain of her feelings. She didn’t really say how she felt about the evening — or you.
Which of these hypothetical women do you find most attractive? Classical psychological theory says that you will be most drawn to the woman who finds you attractive. Being liked is rewarding, and social rewards create positive emotions — including feelings of comfort and safety. This social phenomenon is so well documented that scientists even have a jargony name for it: the reciprocity principle.
But what ever happened to “playing hard to get”? Aren’t we most drawn to what we can’t have? Or at least to what we have to win? Aren’t courtship and romance and love more complex than simple reciprocation? A team of psychological scientists decided to explore these questions in the laboratory, and — since this is the 21st century — they adapted the three scenarios for Facebook.
Erin Whitchurch and Timothy Wilson of the University of Virginia and Daniel Gilbert of Harvard recruited a group of women, all students at UVA, who agreed to supply their Facebook profiles. They thought they were taking part in a study of online dating and were told that male students from other universities had looked at their profiles — along with those of 15 to 20 other women — and had rated each woman according to how well they thought they would get along with her.
This was just a fiction; there were no men involved in the study at all. Even so, the women subsequently viewed Facebook profiles of four men — all likeable, attractive college students. Some heard that these were the men who liked them the most, while others believed these men had given them a so-so rating. Still others were told that these four men’s feelings about them were unknown — they might have been very attracted, or they might have been indifferent.
The scientists asked the women to rate the four men on various measures of attraction: how much they liked the men; how much they’d like to collaborate on a project; how much they’d like the men as friends, casual acquaintances or as potential boyfriends. These ratings were all combined into a single attraction index.
The idea was to see if indeed women reciprocate when men find them attractive — or when they find them unattractive. The scientists also wanted to see if uncertainty is attractive. That is, would the woman be disenchanted or intrigued by men whose feelings were unclear?
The results were clear, and a bit surprising. As described in the online version of the journal Psychological Science, the women were more attracted to the men who liked them a lot — much more attracted than they were to men who were lukewarm in their feelings. This isn’t all that surprising, and it lends support to the reciprocity principle. But — and it’s a big “but” — the women were most attracted to the men whose feelings remained unknown. They found these mystery men even more attractive than men who openly declared their attraction.
The scientists call this the “pleasure of uncertainty,” and they also uncovered a hint as to why this dynamic works. The researchers asked the women how often they thought about the different men — how frequently they “popped into their head” — during the time before they made their ratings. The women spent more time musing about the uncertain men than the others, suggesting that having a man in one’s thoughts can increase attractiveness. These women — the ones contemplating a mystery man — were also in a better mood than the women who had been flattered or deflated.
The women in this study had no information about the men’s choosiness in general. That is, they didn’t know if the men were uniformly “hard to get” or “easy to get.” So this may be a new version of the “playing hard to get” scenario — creating uncertainty to pique interest. And it may be a version especially suited to the 21st century, simulating the kind of information people often get when they meet online. At the very start of the e-dating process, mystery may have some benefits.
Source: Online Dating: The Power of Romantic Uncertainty in a Facebook World
So Heinsberg’s Uncertainty Principle goes beyond physics, there is mystery and Pleasure Of Uncertainty in dating. (So Don’t Tell Your Date How Much You Like Them). Eventually if you want to experience real love dynamics and LOVEMATISM you’ll have to open up to reveal your feelings.
 |
One of the funniest Valentine’s Day Card’s received… The Television … What do you think it says on the inside? (Leave a comment) |
Sherrie Rose
Dedicated to Enhancing Your Love and S*X Life!
==================================
Follow @SherrieRose on Twitter and you’ll get a Direct Message with bonus link for a free Love Bucket Book™
The Love Bucket is a registered trademark. Love Bucket Books™ can be found at http://lovebucketbook.com
==================================
